Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Rise and Fall of Babas; Prevalence of Numerous Sects in Hinduism and the Way Ahead


After recent news and controversies around some of them, 'Babas' have become completely out of flavor. Before the most recent one from Haryana, we had cases with Baba Rampal and Asaram Bapu also, making it look like a "pattern". Our human brain is designed to understand "patterns" and it reflects in the way we are talking about 'Babas' these days. Social media is filled with abuses written by some very educated and bright minds against these Babas. It is not surprising because social media is a means of expression, not a tool of education. But still, what are the lessons we are learning from the infamous 'Babas'?

If we look at their backgrounds, one thing is clear. These Babas were first generation entrepreneurs who ran their spiritual empires like corporate houses. And they lacked tradition, 'sanskara' and were married men with kids (i.e. were no sanyasis) before deciding to go spiritual. Baba Rampal (Original name: Rampal Singh Jatin) had a diploma and worked as junior engineer. He quit his job and started his sect (Satlok Ashram). And what does his sect teach? Among other things it teaches that Saint Kabir is the Supreme Lord; asks disciples not to visit Hindu temples and not to worship Hinduism's trinity of Brahma, Vishnu or Shiva! He is married and has two children.

Asaram Bapu (Original name: Asumal Thaumal Harpalani) was born in a Sindhi family in Sindh, Pakistan and migrated to Ahmedabad after partition. Being a school drop-out, he managed his father's coal and wood business for sometime. He is also married with two kids. Although his teachings are not controversial since he preaches Advaita Vedanta and Bhakti Yoga.

It is also not only a male phenomenon. For example we had Radhe Ma (Original name: Sukhvinder Kaur) who is a school dropout, got married at early age and used to stitch clothes to supplement her husband's income. Before of course joining a religious sect and becoming self-styled god-woman.

Now, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh Insan is married with several children. His Dera Sacha Sauda (DSS) is a registered NGO and all Gurus of DSS have come from Sikh background. They have their own sect/religion and welcome people from all different religions. It is ironical that it is he who has triggered this "anti-Baba" feeling in the masses while he is not really a "Hindu Baba" per se.

And the worst part is: these Babas are not alone. The more you would know about different sects and their beliefs, the more you would get confused and 'uninterested' in religion. ISKCON for example is a very popular sect and we all visit its temples. But ISKCON sect does not consider Krishna as Lord Vishnu's avatar but it considers Lord Krishna as the Supreme God. Worshiping Lord Krishna is a different matter and we all do that - but not an avatar but Supreme Lord? Where does it leave our Lord Shiva? The sect considers Shiva as a manifestation of Lord Krishna! That changes everything!

If you visited the wonderful Akshardham temple; it belongs to Swaminarayan sect. Ever wondered who is Swaminarayan? He was born with orignal name of Ghanshyam Pande in Chhapaiya, Uttar Pradesh in 1781. At early age he joined Uddhav Sampraday which later became Swaminarayan Sampraday as Ghanshyam Pande became Swaminarayan. Followers of Swaminarayan sect believe that Swaminarayan is the complete incarnation of Lord Vishnu and more superior to other avatars.

And then there is Brahma Kumaris. Their name contains "Brahma" and then their preachers keep talking about "Shiva Baba" and it appears so nice to the Hindus. But go deeper and you would realize that the Brahma Kumaris is a full fledged "religion" in itself. They call their founder Lekhraj Kripalani as "Brahma Baba" and Shiv Baba is their Godfather (supreme being). Although most of their basic ideas are similar to Hinduism, there is lot of dogma about how world started, how it is going to end, and who will survive and how.

In the era of these numerous "modern" sects, older sects like Arya Samaj, Ramakrishna Mission etc appear to be "old fashioned". I wonder how many people from younger generation or in the cities are reaching out to them.

Although most interesting thing about Hinduism is that while its "diversity" would appear like its weakness (there are so many beliefs, so many deities, so many sects and hence Hindus are seldom united for any cause), it is actually a strength which has allowed it to "survive". It is common knowledge that a very large set of people are difficult to be kept in one piece and dividing them into smaller sets makes them easier to manage. I think such was the idea of having so many sects. But what if sects start preaching very different things; and try to make themselves break out into separate full fledged religions? It has happened with Sikhism in the past which had started as a sect within Hinduism. If it happens too often and starts giving unwanted results, then it has to be "curbed".

The solution is simple: "return to the roots". According to most central ideas of Hinduism, Supreme Being is called Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva when it creates, preserves and renews. If you see any sect trying to say one of these are higher than others, which essentially means that these three are different and one can be "higher" or "lower" than other; be warned against such upstarts. If you see any sect asking you to "worship" mere mortals like its sect leader, any guru or any imaginary being, be warned. Try to be as near to the ancient practices as possible. If Yagna is not possible, offer flowers and other items which symbolically mean the same (offerings). Try to visit temples of original deities like Shiva, Vishnu or Durga. Pick any one of the deities and keep your faith in one deity instead of making it a spiritual tourism - because the more you would wander, the less peace you would have. Try to read original scriptures but be warned against different versions written by different sect leaders with a political explanation of the meanings. Try to read Swami Vivekananda in case of any doubts, who has done a wonderful job in writing down his thoughts and conclusions on most of the things related to Hinduism. And if you are choosing a Guru, look for his family history and other things apart from competence and the advertising done around him.

Let us take the rise and fall of 'Babas' in a stride as an opportunity to do course correction. Let us also pardon them because they were mere mortals and prone to corruption. Let us watch ourselves instead to avoid any flaws and bad habits getting into us. Even those disgraced 'Babas' taught nice things to others; and hence teachings do not matter. What matters is: how much we get to practice the good that is shared with us.

Om Shanti Shanti Shanti.


- Rahul

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Justice in Gurmeet Ram Rahim Case Leading to Mass Violence

With 30+ people dead, 350+ injured, including 50 women in serious condition, and with a civil-war like situation on the streets, after an unpopular verdict by a court; makes us wonder: "was it worth it?". Was it worth it?

Everyone knew including the court and govt of course, that an unfavorable verdict towards the cult leader would lead to this situation. It appears govt and police tried their best to avoid it and yet it turned out to be exactly the way everyone feared it would turn out to be. Only, we are not sure if the court and govt "feared" at all.

I tried to search internet to get some particulars about the case. In April 2002, an accusation was made in an anonymous letter that a woman including several others were sexually exploited by the cult leader for "3 years". Although there was no case filed by the victim, High Court ordered an inquiry in this case and after sometime HC handed over the inquiry to CBI. The ordeal went on for 15 years; during the time the victims were married to other men and were reluctant to share details. But somehow CBI was able to take statements of two women and other parties. None of the media reports, at least during my internet search, reveal about what proofs CBI collected, apart from of course the "statements" of the victims and some others.

After the ongoing case for 15 years, all of a sudden last month in July, as if due to a divine intervention, the court ordered "daily hearings" in the case. After daily hearings, arguments were closed and the cult leader was pronounced guilty yesterday. None of the media reports reveal particulars of the case like what proofs and evidences were presented, what were challenged, etc. In the era of 20-20 Cricket, we are now seeing "snap judgments". If justice delayed is justice denied, I wonder what "justice hustled" should be called.

What could have been done differently? First, there should not have been daily hearings given the sensitivity of the case. Rushed emergency-like proceedings were expected to "shock" the cult members, leading to social unrest and wide spread speculations. Taking it slowly over at least 6 months would have kept the tempers under control. Secondly, the proceedings of the case should have been briefed to the media, so that people would be aware of and in-line with gravity of the case, fairness of the proceedings and would not get shocked with what was to finally come out. Third, if cult leader was pronounced guilty, verdict on punishment should have been made on the same day, instead of giving 3 days to the chaos and if there was a possibility for the accused to get a bail, his bail application should have been processed on the same day. That would have pacified his agitating and grieving supporters while still keeping the records right.

As we know, this is a CBI court and the cult leader can still go to a higher court to get bail and challenge its verdict. So, was it worth it to let an impression be created as if this was the last straw and that there was no road ahead for the cult leader; leading to mass protests and violence?

Coming to media; while I read news report, I read how the cult leader worked extensively against social evils like drug addiction, helped families financially during daughters' weddings, worked a lot for women empowerment, etc. That does not help build a public opinion against the accused. And media reports which are totally lacking the particulars of the case proceedings, add to the chaos of anxious supporters.

To me, this whole episode appears to be a man-made disaster. While trying to uphold the "justice", the court rushed to decision resulting in shocked reactions of supporters. And worse - this is a trend. Centuries old practice of "triple talaq" was abolished abruptly after the court said it would do "daily hearings". I wonder what has gotten over the judiciary that it is rushing to give most shocking verdicts in most unexpected hurried manner. Next in line can be Ayodhya case which can go the "daily hearing" mode. Are the courts comforted by a strong national government at the center? No matter what the source of this "over confidence" is, it is a recipe of disaster.

Not the verdict themselves, but the manner in which these verdicts are being rushed to, needs review of the judiciary. Given the law and order situation in our country, communal harmony has always been the top agenda of our governments. But all these recent court orders which are being rushed to are linked with communal and religious faiths.

We can hail the court verdicts as victory of justice but we can't afford to lose our men and women like this. Justice for the sake of justice, ignoring the realities of the time, leading to mass violence and destroying the communal harmony in our country appears a better candidate for delaying rather than having it now and leading to disasters.

I would prefer justice delayed but taking public opinion along with it, rather than justice hustled to and leading to mass violence and protests.

I don't think it was "worth it" to have 30 lives lost and social unrest invited over the last 24 hours.

Let peace prevail.


- Rahul