- Rahul
"We had joy, we had fun. We had seasons in the sun."
I read in news
that the Supreme Court chief justice recently compared unemployed youth with
“parasites”, and then a social media storm broke down. Finally, the chief
justice had to “disown” his earlier statement saying he was “misquoted”
(sounded like what politicians do daily). When I looked up the news, I found
that in his original statement, the chief justice had meant well and there was
no need to clarify or retract from his position. Here is how.
What the chief justice wanted to say
was that there are many people around us who live off other people, and instead
of contributing to society, they attack the system society is working on. The
context was a junior lawyer who was using the designation “Senior Advocate”
along with his name on social media for getting attention. The chief justice
got upset at him and perhaps blamed him for being irresponsible and wasteful
like a “cockroach”. The “cockroach” was of course a metaphor for being useless
and wasteful.
The eventual social media furore over
his comment totally justified his initial statement. The unemployed youth
wasting their time on social media went on to create numerous satirical
entities after replacing a term with “cockroach” and wasted days in the name of
humour and satire. How long can one sit over one’s high horse – finally the
horse has to take rest and fodder too, right? Eventually, the social media
uproar will end and the only effect this whole episode will have is lowering
the dignity of our justice system and making a joke of our constitution given
right of free speech.
As we have seen during many
controversies, social media platforms have shown zero control over stopping
misleading, incorrect, fake, malicious or defamatory content. At the same time,
they are earning billions of dollars every year due to the content created by
users. For how long shall we allow total “anarchy” rule and social media
content visibility policies changing the way people speak or behave on these
platforms? If we expect real world to be rule-based, and society functioning on
principles and ethical boundaries, why should we allow social media to be a
lawless, “Jungle Raaj”?
It is high time the Supreme Court of
India must look into this matter since we have seen many a time on such issues
that only the SC can help and no other institution comes up to correct the
situation. Lawless, anarchist, misleading and defamatory nature of social media
must be purged, to make it rule-based, fair, and a controlled entity. It is
very much possible to achieve, just look at how the early-days social media
platforms were designed, for clues. Along with time, “virality” was given first
priority while designing these platforms and this is the root cause of all
evils. This problem can be solved in one day, if the Supreme Court orders.
There are many other important concerns like restricting social media for
children, making content copyright compliant, stopping use of these platforms
for crime and financial fraud.
The day the Supreme Court takes up
this matter in its hands, it won’t matter how many cockroaches line up to
shout, the insecticide of law will be powerful enough to control them for the
benefit of everyone.
- Rahul
There are no bad marriages, only bad
people. Show me a marriage gone bad, I will show you a person gone bad. Why
marriages fail may be a complex question, but my understanding is that
marriages failing is only a symptom of a person failing. A marriage failing has
many effects and after-effects, and people often can’t pinpoint to one
root-cause. But if you look closely, typically, one of the two spouses was a
wrong person, causing the marriage to fail.
What we call “compatibility problem”
is actually one bad spouse trying to impose things on the other, who decides to
push back instead of bending. What we call aspirations and lifestyles not
matching is basically one spouse developing unreasonable aspirations which the
other can’t cope with. And when it comes to other reasons for ending marriages,
like infidelity, domestic violence, alcoholism or cruelty, are obviously due to
lack of character of one spouse.
My theory is that the blame for
ending marriage hardly lies on both parties; but mostly rests on one of the
two. People close to the family know who the bad apple is; though they may not
talk openly about it.
Unfortunately, the real cost of
failing marriage is paid by the children, if any were already produced by the
time the couple decided to part ways. The couples who part ways before kids
were born are lucky and evil both at the same time. There is a theory which
says that if the wife is not interested in having a baby, it is because she is
not sure she wants to spend whole life with that man. And if the man is not
eager to have a kid, he may also be having other plans. Ideally, people marry
to have kids, and one should have kids reasonably sooner after the marriage,
otherwise, in the era where people date each other for years before marriage,
what was the point of getting married to begin with?
Everyone is aware of the
psychological void suffered by the children raised by single parents. What they
are not aware of is ways to avoid “the problem”. A happy and everlasting
marriage is the only solution to avoid this problem.
If you notice the general character
of people in society from the things happening around us and the news and
events, it would be clear that there is a general decline in honesty and
ethical behaviour. It is totally logical, because earlier the world was small
and in small towns everyone knew everyone else. It was difficult not to be
sensitive towards others and people were naturally more social. With life in
big cities, families living long distances, people living in isolation due to
work, etc, there is a natural decline in social behaviour and general empathy.
There is more probability of people going rogue now, and hence marriages are
going rogue too.
The institution of marriage was one
sacred invention by human society which made people from improper animals to
proper men. Right now, the marriages are at threat because the modern world is
breaking age long ways of social life and the modern, materialistic life is not
designed with happy family life as its top priority.
- Rahul
Like millions of people and ‘bots’, I
have also watched PM Modi’s latest video with Italian PM Giorgia Meloni. And I
found it extremely adorable too. But one opposition party leader has taken
offense at the video, calling it “nautanki”, i.e. non-serious banter. It made
me think about it too: what does PM Modi want from such “banter”?
It is clear that PM Modi has
specifically chosen Italian PM Meloni for these series of “banter”. There is no
doubt that Italian PM Meloni is extremely beautiful and has a very positive and
pleasing personality, and somehow it matches the charisma of PM Narendra Modi
so well. Together, they look “magical”! There is something really special about
their pictures, and we can easily see that PM Modi’s face “glows” and some very
positive vibes come out of these images.
At the same time, the relevance of
“Italy” cannot be ignored since Congress Party leader Sonia Gandhi came from
Italy after marrying India’s popular PM Indira Gandhi’s son Rajiv Gandhi.
Before her, or apart from her, I don’t think Indian people had much idea about
Italians. And somehow the kind of impression she made on Indians was not really
positive. She always appeared “cold”, with an entirely emotionless face, and
the politics in Indira Gandhi’s family post her arrival, e.g. removal of her
Indian daughter-in-law Maneka Gandhi from her family and political legacy, made
people keep a negative opinion about her. People also remember Bofors scam and
Italian man named Quattrocchi’s involvement in it. Somehow, Italian PM Meloni
has completely changed the old impression of Italians in the eyes of Indian
people, and it is a big positive for Italy in the long term. Today, people in
India do not look at Italy with suspicion, but with a warmth, and a large
credit for this goes to “Melodi” brand friendship.
We can even wonder if PM Modi does
excessive display of warmth towards PM Meloni to irritate Sonia/Rahul Gandhi
supporters? The way Rahul Gandhi reacted to the latest pictures, clearly points
out that he does not like it at all. But PM Modi will do more of the same
nonetheless.
To summarize, I think PM Modi has not
specifically chosen friendship and warm bonding with Italian PM Meloni due to
political reasons, but it would have happened naturally and genuinely. But he
does intentionally highlight these in the form of social media posts, because
he knows social media users and rest of the world love it when he does so.
Therefore, until “Melodi” friendship
continues, Modi-Bhakts will enjoy but the Modi-hating opposition members are
going to have a very “annoying” time.
- Rahul
I always get air in my motorcycle
tyres only at petrol pumps because many poor local air filler guys deliberately
puncture tyres to get repair work. Plus, air is always “free” at petrol pumps.
But after the recent Iran war made the finances of oil marketing companies
tight, I noticed many petrol pumps had their air filling machines closed.
Finally, I found one petrol pump where the air machine was working, so even
though half of my motorcycle’s fuel tank was already filled, I went and got
petrol filled.
I always say “normal” as soon as the
petrol pump guy starts his work, to avoid paying for the expensive version of
petrol which everyone thinks is just a marketing gimmick. After getting “normal
petrol” filled in my motorcycle’s tank till the brim, I went to get “free air.”
As soon as the air filling guy saw
me, he shouted, “Nitrogen?” I shouted back, “No, normal!” He said the petrol
pump was giving only free nitrogen and the air machine was not working. Don’t
know what happened to all the air filling machines in the city. As I moved
away, I realised I had said “normal” instead of saying “air.” So, while petrol
became “normal” earlier, now even “air” became “normal.”
This struggle to get “normal” things
is really real.
I remember the first time this habit
of shouting “normal” while buying things started - it was while buying packaged
drinking water at railway stations. If you don’t tell them to give you “normal”
water, they give chilled water by default, which takes several hours to come
back to “normal” temperature.
In India, the phrase “normal” is
often used by buyers in shops to distinguish between multiple varieties of the
same product. Here are some common examples:
Biscuits: Many brands have cream-filled, chocolate-coated, or premium versions. Shoppers often say “normal Parle-G” or “normal Marie” to mean the plain, everyday biscuit.
Cold drinks: With options like Diet, Zero Sugar, or flavoured sodas, people ask for “normal Coke” or “normal Thums Up” to mean the regular sugary version.
Milk: Packaged milk comes in toned, double-toned, skimmed, or full-cream. “Normal milk” usually means the standard toned milk most households use.
Chips: With masala, cheese, and exotic flavours available, “normal chips” refers to plain salted potato chips.
Ice cream: Brands sell sugar-free, low-fat, or premium flavours. “Normal vanilla” or “normal chocolate” means the basic, regular scoop.
Tea: Shops may stock green tea, herbal blends, or masala chai. “Normal tea” means the everyday black tea with milk and sugar.
Rice: With basmati, brown, organic, and specialty varieties, “normal rice” refers to the everyday non-basmati white rice used in most homes.
“Normal” is basically shorthand for
“don’t give me the premium, diet, or fancy variant - just the regular one
everyone uses.”
As PM Modi used to say, “this is the
New Normal” in the post-Covid world, now the “not normal” has become the “new
normal” no matter what you try to buy. Asking for “normal” itself feels like an
anomaly.
In today’s complex world, when
everything becomes “not-normal,” perhaps the “normal” is the real “not-normal.”
– Rahul
After watching his film “Laila Majnu”
(2018) on TV, I became actor Avinash Tiwary’s fan. I was really touched by how
he portrayed the role in that film, which went deep in the heart. After a
while, I happened to watch another of his film “Madgaon Express” (2024), which
was a comedy, on TV and was highly impressed by how perfectly Avinash Tiwary
played in a comedy too. Therefore, when I came to know about this film “Ginny
Wedss Sunny 2” being released in the theatres, I got chance to watch his first
film on the big screen. And how lucky I turned out to be.
“Ginny Wedss Sunny 2” is a romantic
comedy based on the life of Sunny or Shivansh, played by Avinash and Ginny or
Geetanjali, played by Medha Shankr who get married under hilarious
circumstances and it only starts a chain of events murkier than their marriage. Both Avinash and Medha have given great performance, with even slightest emotions portrayed so well; and even supporting actors like Sudhir Pandey have done a great job. The first part of the movie before intermission is largely comedy, and the
whole theatre was in splits laughing at the perfectly timed and executed
situational comedy scenes. If you have read my two previous movie reviews, you
would understand that I was not going to pardon the film if I found any
absurdities or imperfections. But this movie gets “A” grade in all departments.
The movie is based in Rishikesh and
Uttarakhand, and captures its natural beauty very well. The whole natural
beauty and daily life captured in this film is “dream like” beautiful. The
movie also shows how social media is impacting our lives and h`ow India is torn
between modernity and traditions. The film walks on a tight rope and comes out
as a remarkable winner.
The wedding of Ginny and Sunny is
only the beginning – and the movie then largely captures the “real task of
marriage” – which is to “sustain” it. Marriages are falling apart in high
numbers these days, and this movie captures the nuances of it in such a perfect
manner. The male ego, the female ego, the burden of expectations from larger
family, intrusion by society, impact of women’s education and independence on
marriage and families, problems due to misunderstandings, role of elders in
families, sibling rivalries and bonds, father-son and mother-daughter
relationships, all these aspects are captured so very well in this film. And
these are shown even while in the context of comedy, which is remarkable. The
story is captivating and there is not a single boring moment in the film. The
director of this film Prasshant Jha has done a genius work.
The songs of this film and also too
good. Earlier I was enchanted only by the song “Chhap Tilak” but while watching
the film, I got to know that there are total seven songs and all are so
brilliant.
Without providing too much of
spoilers, I would highly recommend this film for one and all. It is a wholesome
family entertainer as well as an educational one for the young couples and
those facing challenges in their marriage. I witnessed the entire theatre
audience enjoying the film from the beginning to the end, and at the end they
only wanted more.
Wishing all the success to this film
“Ginny Wedss Sunny 2” and thanks to the makers for such a nice time watching
it.
- Rahul
A few weeks ago, 'Dhurandhar: The Revenge' had hit the cinema halls, and
everyone said one thing, that it had “peak detailing”. Last week, another
Bollywood film released, with Akshay Kumar, the hero of the masses in its lead.
After watching it, I could not stop myself from noticing its “weak detailing”.
Here is how.
1. Similarity with Bhool Bhulaiyaa
franchise: You will keep missing Kartik Aaryan
Although, the original ‘Bhool
Bhulaiyaa’ (2007) film was directed by Priyadarshan, the same director of this
film, and Akshay Kumar was its hero, but the real mass success of the franchise
had occurred only when Kartik Aaryan had joined it for Part 2 and 3. About 20
years passed since the first film, and by now, Kartik Aaryan is synonymous with
Bhool Bhulaiyaa franchise. And this film does not have Kartik! To make it feel
weirder, this film still has almost whole cast of Bhool Bhulaiyaa franchise:
Tabu, Rajpal Yadav, Manoj Joshi, Asrani, Paresh Rawal, etc. It keeps feeling as
if the film makers chose Akshay instead of Kartik "by mistake".
2. Akshay Kumar as boyfriend
material
Akshay Kumar is about 59 years old.
And it shows in this film and we can’t ignore it. After a few scenes at the
beginning, we can see his “chest hair” which is grey and weird. After a while,
we need to see how his whole body skin is wrinkled, like a 75 year old man. We
also need to notice every once in a while that he has “polished” his face to
appear younger, and it has resulted in his face not matching with rest of his
body and it keeps feeling “what the yukk”. His father-in-law Superstar Rajesh
Khanna at least had the decency to take up "father roles: after he aged.
Akshay Kumar is still chasing girls in the bushes. In one scene, when
Akshay Kumar meets the fiancée of his sister, he calls him "beta" in
a natural tone. That scene "nailed" the weak detailing of this film
like a hard fact.
3. Vulgarity in Comedy
At the beginning of the film, in a
comic scene, Rajpal Yadav pulls down Akshay Kumar’s trouser by mistake, and we
are forced to see his bum, totally naked. At first, I could not believe “what
just happened”, but I knew it was weak detailing camouflaged as peak detailing.
After a while, the movie focuses entirely on the “housemaid” to create vulgar
comedy. Rajpal Yadav, the famous “mandir ka ghanta” whom anyone can ring when
one feels like, is made the villain while it is not even his fault – although
this part has become totally hilarious. And by the end of the film, there is a
song where group of women are dancing, and the same housemaid is seen dressed
and dancing like other rich noble women. Weak detailing.
4. Wamiqa Gabbi as a fresh face in
the female lead
Perhaps the only sane and logical
character in this film is of Wamiqa Gabbi who plays female lead opposite Akshay
Kumar. She is shown as extremely beautiful, although at times she starts
resembling Aishwarya Rai and at times even Alaya Furniturewalla (female lead of
Kartik Aryan’s film Freddy (2022). She brings a fresh face among all other old
stale, wrinkled stars. But then, our happiness is not made to last long. A few
scenes into the film and I could not stop noticing that her upper tooth was
“bent”. Out of the two front upper teeth, one is longer than the usual and is
also bent as if dentist has tried grinding it to make it even. I know that it
is not her fault, that best of the Hollywood stars also had some teeth problem,
and it feels like “body shaming”, but I have just put my observations since I
could not “un-notice” it. Almost feeling guilty now, but I wonder if this
should be considered normal in the age of “peak detailing”.
5. Other weak detailing
The movie’s plot is so weak and full
of holes. First, no one can understand the necessity to conduct the wedding in
that haunted palace even after it becomes clear that the bride would die if she
gets married in that venue. The ghost fears light, but in the end scene the
ghost is shown as making offering of twelve brides to demon in a cave full of “fire
torches” which obviously emit “light”. In the climax scene in the cave, the
bride’s wedding saree keeps changing colour from red to pink and pink to red. There
is unnecessary “doubling” of characters and even Akshay Kumar plays a
double-role and it becomes too confusing. The palaces in the film clearly look
like Rajasthani palaces, but are claimed to be situated somewhere in UP. The scenes
of world famous ghats of Varanasi and pictures of the city having multi-storey
buildings are shown as some old city from centuries ago. And after completing this
whole film about ghosts, Akshay Kumar does “virtue signalling” by slapping the astrologer
of his sister’s in-laws after taking him aside in secret, and then tells him “do
not tell anyone or else they will laugh at you”. It made no sense why the big
jyotishi would tolerate getting slapped like that. And this “do not tell anyone”
is repeated so many times in the film, and so many characters tell the same “do
not tell anyone about this” to so many other characters so frequently, that this
weak detailing becomes a joke.
6. The bhoot and the horror are
well-made and feel original
Although slightly similar to the
Bhool Bhulaiyaa franchise, the ghost/demon (bhoot) in this film resembling a
bat, is really innovative and appears real. And the bhoot is finally a 'male',
not a female ‘chudail’ like earlier films. The horror scenes are able to make
you feel horrified and the use of old temple and gospel stories from the Hindu
epic tales feel very real. But at the same time, I did not like the way Akshay
Kumar is able to physically hurt the bhoot in the climax scene and the very
long fight scene where he appears almost equal in physical strength to the
Rakshasa. What is even the point of a big fight scene in the climax when
everyone knows that the “hero will get beaten up at first but will be able to
kill the villain eventually”. It is like a “fixed match” no one will bet even a
paisa on. But then, this should not be surprising, since we are dealing with
Bollywood’s ordinary films with weak detailing.
Final verdict: Recommended
All said and done, the film is
entertaining, with too many comic and laughter scenes and at the same time some
very good horror in the later part, with usual performances by the cast. The
setup of royal palaces of Rajasthan and the dense jungle scenes are also nice
to watch. I think this film should definitely qualify for an entertaining
casual watch and hence I recommend it, despite my freak detailing in this blog
review.
- Rahul
Indians went to space and landed on moon
and we are also getting bullet train soon
but when something is done in TCS Nashik by a goon
the guardians of the trade are found to be cartoon
the govt promises action but waits for next distraction
so that people's memory can face obstruction
we are expected to move from one tragedy to the next
until we fell victim one day and end up in a text
then the cycle is expected to repeat
I wonder what they sent the man on moon to complete
Perhaps they know there is no TCS on the moon
And the demons on the earth won't reach there by noon
- Rahul Tiwary