Friday, September 25, 2020

Travelogue: Motihari Railway Station


Motihari is a town in North Bihar, close to Nepal border. Motihari, the district head quarter of East Champaran, is the place where Mahatma Gandhi was jailed during his famous ‘Champaran movement’. Motihari has several monuments and a museum related to Mahatma Gandhi. Motihari railway station was renamed as “Bapudham Motihari railway station” in reminder of its connection with Gandhi ji.

Here are some of the pictures of Bapudham Motihari Railway Station, taken this year in 2020:






- Rahul Tiwary

Monday, September 21, 2020

Movies: Sadak and Sadak 2

 


I watched Sadak (1991) recently, followed by Sadak 2 (2020). Sadak, directed by Mahesh Bhatt, was a super hit at its time and is still remembered for its story and performances. Sanjay Dutt played a legendary role of a taxi driver who goes on to save his girl, her role played by Pooja Bhatt. Sadashiv Amrapurkar played an epic role of a dreaded villain called ‘Maharani’ who was a eunuch and ran a brothel. After Pooja gets sold to the brothel by her uncle to repay a loan, Ravi (Sanjay Dutt) falls in love with her and tries to save her by taking her away on the run. But most importantly, in the end, the couple unite after Ravi kills all the bad guys, and hence the story becomes ‘happy ending’. Although I found the movie involving too much violence and some not so logical moments, the happy ending comforted me, and it felt like ‘worth spending the time’.

Sadak 2 is a sequel to the original movie and it tells the story of Ravi (Sanjay Dutt) after he loses Pooja in a road accident. Ravi is mentally disturbed and hallucinates where he talks to Pooja and also sees her (even after she is dead). The story involves a theme of “anti-superstition” or “anti-Godmen culture”. The main story is a complex one which keeps the viewers involved for quite some time. Alia Bhatt plays the role of the only daughter of a rich businessman, and she is trying to eradicate the prevalence of “fake Gurus” who exploit people in the name of God. The reason for her motivation being that her mother was killed by the aunt under the influence of a Godman. In the end, the story turns upside down and hence it becomes a thriller and full points to the movie for that. I am not revealing whole story because it is a new movie and people should watch it.

I see a few incoherencies in the movie and have my observations:

1. I think the movie should not have been made as a “sequel” of original movie ‘Sadak’, but it should have been made into a standalone movie and then it would have made much better sense. There is no continuance of the original story line.

2. It was not necessary to show Sanjay Dutt suffering from a mental illness. It was possible for him to hear his own thoughts, instead of “seeing” or “hearing” Pooja even after she was dead. Although the movie’s major theme is “anti-superstition” but Sanjay Dutt keeps seeing Pooja Bhatt and it looks more like her ghost than a hallucination, and hence is self-contradicting.

3. As per the prevailing trend of Indian movie industry, Hinduism is singled out for showing most of the evil things that happen in the name of God or religion. Although Sadak 2 avoids showing saffron color and chooses black color as a theme which tries to tone down its anti-Hinduism nature. But for a change, movie industry should also make movies showing “fake Fakirs” or “fake Sufis” or “fake pastors”; instead of making it “fake Gurus” which singles out Hinduism as a target.

4. Aditya Roy Kapur is an extremely talented actor; and shows a wonderful “switch” from a hero to a villain in Sadak2. But in the later part of the movie, his role is curtailed abruptly, which is noticeable and hence not nice. For example, during the press conference scene, when Alia says that evidence is in the form of Aditya Roy Kapur, he is not shown speaking even a single word. It looks unnatural. In the earlier part he played a much more prominent role.

5. Sanjay Dutt has played a very realistic role of Ravi who is disillusioned after his wife’s death and finds no purpose left for a living. He has experienced life, has achieved things but when he loses the person connecting him to the world (his wife), and since he has no kids, he finds no purpose in life and tries to commit suicide. That moment in a way is prophetic. As a society we have to think of ways in which we should avoid that situation.

Sanjay Dutt has played the best role in the movie. Alia Bhatt is at her best too, even though her character was not too strongly scripted. The villain “Guruji Gyan Prakash”’s role played by Markand Deshpande is not so powerful, even though Markand Deshpande is a genius actor, just because the character is taken straight out of evil Godmen shown in second grade TV serials. I think Sadak 2 could have been a much better film if it was made as a separate film instead of fitting it into a “sequel”. While the first part Sadak was a 'happy ending' story, the second part Sadak 2 has ruined everything: it shows that Pooja did not bear any child, dies in a road accident, Ravi suffers mental problems and in the end dies. This sad twist to everything is a grave injustice to the fans of original movie Sadak. 

Overall, Sadak 2 is still a good film which should be watched. And one should not get affected by political campaign against the movie by certain social media influencers.

- Rahul Tiwary


Friday, September 4, 2020

Need for Anti Media Trial Law


If you have been following news and updates on Sushant Singh Rajput’s death case, you must have noticed that Rhea Chakraborty is perceived to the prime suspect. But if you try to think what all hard evidences are against her, you would realize that there are virtually no evidence linking her directly to Sushant’s death! But why have we almost concluded that she is the “culprit” or “prime suspect”. It is because of the FIR filed by Sushant’s father where he suspected Rhea of being responsible for Sushant’s death; but it is also because of the manner in which media and especially TV News Media has been portraying her. It can be said that almost all TV channels have already solved the Sushant’s death case and also found the guilty person: Rhea Chakraborty. It is a textbook case of “Media Trial”.

Press Council of India (PCI) is a statuary regulatory body responsible to act as a watchdog and maintain adherence of press and media outlets in the spirits of Press Council Act. A few days ago, it had sent out a note to all media outlets against any “media trial”. You can read about it here: [Reference].

Taking strong objection to the coverage of the Sushant Singh Rajput case by many media outlets, the Press Council of India on Friday said the media should adhere to the norms of journalistic conduct in covering cases under investigation and is advised not to carry out its own "parallel trial". The media should not narrate the story in a manner so as to induce the general public to believe in the complicity of the person indicted, the Press Council of India (PCI) said in its advisory.

But, TV News Channels did not pay any heed to the warning and carried on with the same kind of news handling. There are two reasons behind this:

  1. The PCI has no power to enforce or impose any penalty on either the individual journalists or the publications [Reference
  2. It is believed that Electronic Media, TV News channels and social media do not come under the purview of PCI. [Reference]

It can be easily understood that the government needs to empower PCI so that it can effectively handle situations like the current case where Rhea Chakraborty’s media trial is the ongoing norm. At the same time, the vilification of Rhea Chakraborty strongly demands for an “anti- Media Trial” law.

The “Anti Media-Trial Law” which I am proposing should allow PCI or any other stationary regulatory body to effectively enforce the spirits of honest journalism. At the time where “Fake News” is widely spread and even the President of United States Donald Trump has been campaigning against it, India can show the way to the world by making such a law. Such a law should not be too harsh and should have enough checks and balances in place to avoid its misuse, because journalistic freedom and freedom of Press are very important and our first priority. 

I request our government to think about this proposal and bring a legislature to stop the unjust and vilifying episodes of “Media trials” in our country.

- Rahul Tiwary