Kumar Rahul Tiwary;
Sep 2012
Politicians
world over are famous to make illogical laws and pass laughable dictates.
Perhaps latest in the list is an upcoming “law” in India where husbands will be
legally bound by law to pay a “salary” to wives for performing household work.
Initially when I heard about this proposed law and “salary”, I thought it would
be just a means to empower women by making them legally own part of monthly
household savings (if there were not enough laws already giving them part of
husband’s property). But when I read the actual news which clearly mentioned
that this salary would be for the “household work done by wives”, I was
shocked. Even my wife laughed at this proposed “law”.
The Proposal:
The
proposal is mooted by Ms. Krishna Tirath, Minister for Women and Child
Development Let us read the minister in her own words:
“A majority of women in India are involved in household chores after getting married but they do not get any salary for it. The socially accepted behaviour becomes a tragedy when a woman gets divorced or is widowed when she is left with nothing for survival. The Government is mulling to bring a law under which a husband will have to legally pay a definite amount to his wife from his salary and the Ministry has started preparing a draft in this regard,” Tirath told Indian Express.She also favoured for exempting this income from the tax net saying, “The income of the domestic help or cook is not taxed.” “When the housewife is performing all those chores and much more efficiently, why should her income be taxed?” [Ref]
Wives as domestic
helps and cooks
Should
we thank the minister for putting housewives ahead of “domestic help” or “cooks”
by saying housewives performs “all those chores” and “much more efficiently”? I
am not sure.
In
my personal opinion, this proposed law is so demeaning and insulting to the
women that it should never be passed and needs to be opposed strongly. Putting
a price tag for the household work a wife does at “her” home brings her to the
class of domestic servants and none better.
This
proposed law in current shape not only looks foolish but also is provocative. It
is not surprising that it has invited the ire of Men’s Rights Groups who have
even asked PM’s intervention to stop this law. Save Family Foundation, representing
around 40 men's rights organizations across India, has
termed this proposal one-sided [Ref].
May be such proposals bring out some positive changes for the rights of men
too?
Many
individuals and organizations have rightly opposed this proposal. I liked what novelist
Dr SL Bhyrappa said on this issue: [Ref:
Salary to wife against Hindu Law]
“As there was no dharma and nyaya concept in the western countries, the economic system of such countries is collapsing. The proposed Bill which is suited for Europe and America, will affect the Indian family system,” he said.“If the government brings in the Bill, the bondage between husband and wife will no longer hold,” he said.
Track Record
of Ms. Krishna Tirath
Ms.
Krishna Tirath is an MP from Delhi, and member of Congress Party. Her past
looks marred by controversies generated by both silly mistakes and serious
cases of corruption:
Ministry
of Women and Child Development which is headed by Krishna Tirath published a
full page advertisement on 2010 to mark the National Girl Child Day. To the
embarrasement of whole nation, former Pakistan Air Force chief Tanvir Mahmood
Ahmed's photograph appeared in the Ad along with our PM Dr. Manmohan Singh and
Congress president Sonia Gandhi. Ultimately, Prime Minister's Office apologized
to the nation after Krishna Tirath refused to accept the blunder. You are read
this news here [Ref]
In
Sep 2012, Central Administrative Tribunal quashed the appoitment of Yashvi
Tirath, daughter of Minister Krishna Tirath because of irregularities. You can
read about the news here: [Ref:
CAT quashes DD selection of minister's kin]
Yashvi Tirath was ranked 33th after a written exam and audition for the post of anchor-cum-correspondent in state run telecaster Doordarshan News. Only 30 candidates were to be called for interview; suddenly, the number was arbitrarily increased to 35. Just as abruptly, barely two days before the interview, its weightage was changed from 25% to 33%.Yashvi scored an impressive 90 marks in the interview and landed the job. She also happens to be the daughter of minister for women and child welfare Krishna Tirath.This is only one of 24 such instances of "arbitrary and irregular" appointments made last year that were quashed by the Central Administrative Tribunal on Monday. A shocked Tribunal, headed by chairman V K Bali, cancelled the selection of the journalists working with DD News, finding "misuse of marks in the interview" and "irregularities having vitiated the whole process."
My
Conclusions:
- The proposed law is in blatant disregard to the interests of women and their place in Indian society. It should be rejected and opposed by all.
- Instead of making such controversial and foolish “laws” to empower women, which would result in more family disharmony as well as degraded status of women in society, the Ministry of Women and Child Development should do real ground work, to both enforce existing laws and to provide support and opportunities to women.
- Ms. Krishna Tirath, the Minister of Women and Child Development has some tainted past record. All charges of corruption against her should be probed as soon as possible and if found true, she should be punished and the chair should go to someone more competent and sensible than her.
Disclaimer: The views
expressed in the article are personal and do not necessarily reflect the views
of any organization associated with the author. There is no attempt to hurt the
feelings of readers and any unintended ones are regretted. You are welcome to
share your own personal opinion on this article in the comments section.
4 comments:
I wish there was more from the author on the subject. The title, though catchy, offers little to read. The track record of the minister as presented by the author does not offer much either in favor or against the case.
Thanks, and even I agree with you :)I felt the same after posting the piece that I had not "written" much on it. But then I didn't think that the issue itself needs much discussion or elaboration because this whole "idea" or putting a price tag for the work a woman does at "her home", is so absurd. Only if there are sheds of grey, would I have find merit in going into more details. I tried to read some newspaper articles but found no strong argument in the favor of the bill which I could refute in my blog post. So I let it go.
Even I felt that I had digressed into discussing the minister's past which is unrelated to this topic. May be it happened because I didn't find much matter to write on this topic, as well as it seems I was "angry" at the minister for proposing such a law and my anger found some satisfaction in going into her past track record. I can try to justify it by saying she has a past record of making silly mistakes and doing serious graft and hence this proposed law should be taken in that light, but I won't do it. The issues are unrelated.
Anyways, thank you for your reading and feedback...
Yun kah lijiye etane behude kanun to Desh me Angrej bhi nahi banakar gaye.ye to hamari mul sanskriti ki jadon ko hi hila dene wali kargujari hai,Es sarkar kaa sara karobar hi "Lal-bujhakadon"wala hai.pati-patni k rishton ko kanun me es tarah darj kar bhir usane es baat ko sabit kiya hai.Etihas uthakar dekh lijiye kanun parmparao ko sahejane ke liye hote hain.England me to likhit sanvidhan hi nahi hai.wahan ki sansad parmparao ko hi kanun manati hai.ye netritw vihin ek dal ki dal-dal ke chhinto ko sahane ki hamari majburi hai.usi ki ye bhi ek banagi hai.
Aapane bahut gambhirta ke sath es vishay ko uthaya....badhai...!
Sadar,
kim
हाँ किम जी, आपने बिलकुल सच कहा... कानून समाज के लिए और सामाजिक रिश्तों को और सुन्दर बनाने के लिए है. पर सरकार और कुछ मंत्रीगण पता नहीं किस दुनिया में रहते हैं कि उनकी ऐसी सोच थी... आशा है सरकार इस कानून को लागू करने पर कोई कदम नहीं उठाएगी..
Post a Comment