I think a New Year is
just a conspiracy to give us hope. We hope that new year will be different as
if this world or even us will start working in a different manner just because
we bought home a new calendar :) Nevertheless like in good movies no animal is
ever injured during giving us a good hope. Eat better, do better and feel
better in the new year 2015!
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Saturday, December 27, 2014
Superman: Salman-Ka-Fan
Arjun Kapoor dances to
the tunes of “Mai hun Superman… Salman ka Fan” and something is just too loud
to be ignored. We can call it pride or even arrogance; but being Salman-ka-Fan
sort of justifies it all… With this brush if we want to paint the fossilized
topic of comparing the three famous Khans of Bollywood, how do we rate the
Aamir, Shahrukh and Salman?
Aamir had always been
too ‘girlish’. Several times he tried too hard to break this image but alas –
how could be change it unless he comes on screen with a mask every time! So it
does not matter whether he plays a tapori in ‘aati-kya-Khandala’ wearing
leather jacket and growing a bit of stubble, he still appears like a cheeky
chick. Shahrukh has slightly different flavor - even when clean-shaven he
always appeared like unshaven – and he made the ‘boy-next-door’ look his
biggest strength. Not all girls actually believe in their dream of marrying a
prince – most of them would perhaps agree to marry a frog if the frog wears
Versace. And what a rich wrinkled frog Shahrukh has been! A dog can bite, even
a cat can bite, but a frog is too harmless to be of any harm – and that is what
makes him attractive to girls. Girls could dream a lizard to turn into a
monster but never an SRK to be threatening to them – that is quite some quality
to possess. That brings us to the only Khan who has remained himself all
through the ages. Salman Khan is the only Khan who never needed to humiliate
himself in order to win our hearts… Don’t believe it? Just look at coy and
childish Aamir playing pK!
Photo: Aamir playing
pK
Coming back to Aamir
being girlish. It was no surprise that Aamir failed when he tried to portray a
Manly (Mangal) Pandey. In order to hide his girlish looks, Aamir tried
something which worked just as bad – he tried to play the kid! We all loved him
in 3-Idiots because appeared too natural for the juvenile’s role he was
playing. He continued the same to Dhoom-3 where he played a character suitable
for his looks – that of a cute child. Btw, before that he failed once again in
Talash – because he was playing the role of a Manly Policewallah with a manly
moustache. So in pK he returned to his comfort zone and this time took it several
notches above – he made himself into a clown! Ok, fine, it was alien. But the
alien he was playing seemed to have been inspired by a clown – just look at the
way he carries himself off…
Photo: Aamir failed
each time he played a manly character like Mangal Pandey or in Talash
but succeeded when he played a boyish joker or a clown-like alien.
While Aamir thrived on
his girlish looks, Shahrukh was neither a proper ‘boy’ nor a proper ‘girl’ and
his only strength was his ‘newspaper vendor boy-next-door’ look. So our so
called King failed when he played Ashoka the Great. His tapori-panthi, sly,
street-smart moves were out-of-class for the classy look and feel needed in the
character. Shahrukh also made complete fool of himself when he tried to outdo
the original Bachchan’s Don. People would accept him a road-chhap tapori but he
appeared to be wearing rented suits and stolen deodorants for his role as a
Don. SRK being the only Khan without a look worth second glance outdid all his
previous antics by growing his six-packs which appeared more naturally grown in
a starving smoking man than a person frequenting a gym of any shape and size.
With his eight-packs he proved in front of the whole world how desperate he
could be! Before all this madness about body-chiseling SRK was thriving on
being a rare combination of intelligence, manners and romanticism. All his
earlier life he must have been an ignored, average and invisible boy and hence
the viewers connected with him instantly! After all, despite having the worst
biopics he always used to get the girl by the end of the movies! How
fascinating for the public to see such a pathetic boy getting all beautiful
girls from one movie to the other! To the girls, he appeared to possess many complimentary
qualities which they would like to have in their boyfriends, if nothing less
then nothing more than that also. Being a boring loyal husband was not an
option but compulsion to the King Khan without a proper beard.
Photo: Shahrukh failed
when he tried characters which required class; was ridiculed when he grew
six-packs perhaps as a revenge on God for not giving him a proper body
The only Khan who did
not need to humiliate himself in order to make it big at the Box Office has
been the undisputed Salman
Khan. Salman is the ultimate Dabang of Bollywood – the unashamed handsome devil
– who had it all with grace and class each time. The only Khan who when takes
his shirt off, people don’t close their mouths with hands, like they did with
Aamir’s weirdly tattooed Ghazini or Shahrukh’s not-worth-counting packs. While
Aamir might have gone completely nude to promote his one movie and Shahrukh
might have nearly killed himself to develop eight-pack abs in this old age,
Salman is the man who has grown older with grace worthy of his (sur)name.
Photo: Salman Khan
is the unashamed Dabang of Bolywood; the only Khan who did not need to
humiliate himself to make it big at the Box Office
While Aamir went after
marrying multiple women and also did not miss to create affairs with a White
woman abroad to produce illegitimate child and Shahrukh with his poor looks
held on to perhaps the only woman who agreed to marry him as a loyal husband,
it is Salman who dared to love. When he loved, he made no attempts to hide it.
When his women abandoned him, he cried like any human would. And when he loved
next time, he made no secret of that either! How can you not love the humanly
vulnerable yet rock solid Khan? If you see him or watch his interviews, you
would certainly notice one thing about him – he never pretends! He is
straightforward and dil-se; what all other phony actors claim to be but are
not.
Salman Khan is the only
Khan with real fan-following from other men. If you are Salman-ka-Fan, you
won’t need to be ashamed, something which comes frequently if we start to think
about being fans of Aamir or Shahrukh. That is why Arjun Kapoor says
“Salman-ka-Fan” and takes the Taj Mahal by storm:
Photo: Arjun Kapoor
sings ‘Salman-ka-Fan’ in Tevar
Salman Khan was the
only Khan who had the guts to stand with NaMo (Modi) and fly kites in front of
the whole media, even before Modi got power in Delhi. On the other hand,
Shahrukh is a known Pakistan-sympathizer while Aamir is by and large
non-political.
Photo: Salman Khan
with Narendra Modi
Salman Khan is also the
only Khan who can pair-up with the Dabang Girl Sonakshi. Imagine girlish Aamir
or tapori Shahruku appearing like school-kids in front of the Desi Girl? We
would rather eat all the popcorn ever produced than watching the lesser-Khans
humiliate themselves once again…
Photo: Salman
‘Dabang’ Khan with Sonakshi ‘Khamosh’ Sinha
On these happier notes,
let me now take a break :)
© Rahul | Written in
leisure | Cheer Up | Detailed Disclaimer |
Friday, December 26, 2014
Tuesday, December 23, 2014
Wishing Merry Christmas
In our last call before
client (from a western country) went on year-end vacations I wished her Merry
Christmas and Happy New Year in advance. She said, "Well I do not
celebrate Christmas. But thank you." What was my reaction? First reaction
was of surprise. But what was I surprised at? I think I was surprised at her
frankness, honesty and speaking straight. Now is that something alien in our
country? If you wish someone in India "Merry Christmas", and one
replies, "I do not celebrate Christmas", I guess you won't judge the
person kindly. But if we judge the statement factually and impartially, there
is nothing wrong in it. Very often we find people in Western countries open,
frank and honest about whatever they do or don't do. In India we beat around
the bush. We call it composite culture may be to envelop our insecurities into
something of higher purpose as a form of justification. Is it our politeness,
accommodating nature, tolerance or conformism and lack of confidence in our
individuality which make us not frank and honest about what we do or don't do?
I think it is just our lack of thought... I think we are a rushed society with
no time to think...
And btw, Merry Christmas in advance :)
© Rahul
Saturday, December 20, 2014
The Madness of King George III
King George III of
Britain ruled for 60 years (1760-1820), longer than any other King of Britain,
and is considered good king by many historians. George III was very popular in
the masses. He was the only British king who did not take a mistress and
remained loyal to his only wife (the king and queen had 15 children - 9 sons
and 6 daughters). He spent large part of his personal money on art and charity.
He was devout to religion and prayed for hours. For most part he acted like a
constitutional monarch supporting the initiatives of parliament though also
playing power politics. Early in his reign, Britain defeated France and became
dominant power in North America and India. Afterwards Americans battled their
freedom and became a nation which caused great frustration to him. Later in his
life, King George III suffered from some illness which affected his mental
balance.
The movie 'The Madness of King George' shows some of the realities which
he had to face even after being a king. When the king goes ill, doctors try
methods like bleeding and blistering him as a cure. When he appears mad, he is
pushed to ground and sat over by servants, chained in a chair to restrain him,
isolated in a castle, and he is treated like any old rag on the street - but
perhaps as a method of treatment. His son tries to capture power and the
parliamentarians openly ridicule him as a lunatic.
It shows how life is unfair
in a way; how life is a great leveler; how people respect your position and not
really you; how relationships change when situation changes...
© Rahul
Friday, December 19, 2014
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Everything we see is a perspective
Some months back I
posted this pic on facebook. I got so many 'likes'. I loved this image because
of three reasons: 1. Wisdom in its quote, 2. I am a big fan of Russell Crowe 3.
In my wildest fantasies sometimes I fashion myself as a warrior :) But blinded
by these reasons, I did not notice what was there on Russell Crowe's shoulders :)
Many months afterwards when I realized that there was a dead animal on his
shoulders, I said Yuk!!! I wanted to be a warrior but not one who carried dead foxes
and wolves on his shoulders! Because after all "What we do in life echoes
in eternity"! So I searched for his image without a dead animal on his
shoulders. And I don't find one... So what is the message? I see it as a dead
animal, he saw it as utility. Marcus Aurelius said, "Everything we see is
a perspective, not the truth."
Monday, December 15, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
#Society: Who is Anti-Women?
Saw some random posts on facebook, where women wrote anti-men posts and got 100+ likes (it's sure way to get fame). But I think I subscribe to an old practical wisdom which says that "women are women's worst enemies". Let us discuss some of the most serious problems women protest about.
Dowry: if you observe, most serious and adamant dowry demands come from mothers-in-law and not from fathers of the grooms (fathers being worldly wise demand it when they know the other party can pay while mothers are often ruthless and merciless on such matters); women's celebrated infatuation towards gold and jewelry is also a reason why dowry system continues to live. Women rule the house - is a widely known fact. But since mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law fight for power, the later suffer in the beginning while the former suffer in the last days. Some families don't educate their daughters beyond a limit - because girls become too 'demanding' and insist on 'equal' match ('equal' boy means 10 times wealthier), which poor families find difficult to court. Solution - women should stop looking at potential grooms as 'ticket to good days' and should accept them as 'human beings' who got feelings. It is the mothers who treat their sons preferentially, like feeding them better, since they believe boys have to do more work. Such differential upbringing makes boys respect girls less. The fact is that most fathers love their daughters more than they love their sons. (Many mothers love their sons more than daughters.) Most brothers will go to any extent to protect their sisters. (Most sisters will side with their husbands than with their brothers when time comes.) A husband even ignores parents many times to support wife. (Many times wives treat husbands merely as cash-cows) But what do men get in return? Loads of abuses. From women, who have to complain since it makes them feel great; and from men, who have to be biased towards women in order to appear unbiased towards women.
- Rahul
(All personal opinion based on observations - no claim to be holier than your opinion :)
Dowry: if you observe, most serious and adamant dowry demands come from mothers-in-law and not from fathers of the grooms (fathers being worldly wise demand it when they know the other party can pay while mothers are often ruthless and merciless on such matters); women's celebrated infatuation towards gold and jewelry is also a reason why dowry system continues to live. Women rule the house - is a widely known fact. But since mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law fight for power, the later suffer in the beginning while the former suffer in the last days. Some families don't educate their daughters beyond a limit - because girls become too 'demanding' and insist on 'equal' match ('equal' boy means 10 times wealthier), which poor families find difficult to court. Solution - women should stop looking at potential grooms as 'ticket to good days' and should accept them as 'human beings' who got feelings. It is the mothers who treat their sons preferentially, like feeding them better, since they believe boys have to do more work. Such differential upbringing makes boys respect girls less. The fact is that most fathers love their daughters more than they love their sons. (Many mothers love their sons more than daughters.) Most brothers will go to any extent to protect their sisters. (Most sisters will side with their husbands than with their brothers when time comes.) A husband even ignores parents many times to support wife. (Many times wives treat husbands merely as cash-cows) But what do men get in return? Loads of abuses. From women, who have to complain since it makes them feel great; and from men, who have to be biased towards women in order to appear unbiased towards women.
- Rahul
(All personal opinion based on observations - no claim to be holier than your opinion :)
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Uber Banned in India for Right Reasons
In India, because we were ruled by corrupt parties/politicians in the past, we developed an attitude which said, "if govt has done something, it must be wrong." This theory explains why as soon as we heard about any decision made by govt, our first reaction was, "it is wrong". After recent crime in Delhi by its driver, govt banned Uber. Since Delhi is under central control, opposition got chance to target BJP/Modi govt over it. But if we care to read the news, Uber was banned for right reasons.
Uber does not even
have a call center. No emergency number passengers can contact. Also no police
verification for drivers. No permit for rent-a-cab. Uber also violated RBI's
guidelines on its payment service. The only problem is that it was not banned
before and banned only after something horrible happened.
Delhi is too
important a place for Govt not to be knowing about this service. They should
have banned it from the beginning until it complied with the rules. And we
should thank govt for taking actions like these - if govt continues like this,
all companies will become responsible in maintaining safety services for us. This
ban shows, that govt is decisive, it took big decision to ban companies because
of one incident of rape. In the past what was govt's attitude? "It is only
one case", "it is exceptional case" etc etc.. and now? We shall ban a company if they fail
in maintaining safety features for women. We should note this change in
attitude by the govt and we should appreciate it.
And if we think that
only a poor and uneducated country banned it in one state - we should know that
others like Spain have done it too for same reasons:
Uber banned in Spain & Thailand, sued in Portland, hassled in Rio
On Tuesday, both Thailand and Spain banned Uber. You know the drill by now: The company’s drivers don’t have taxi permits and/or insurance, and the authorities have had an earful from furious cab drivers who do have to pay for such things. Yesterday it was authorities in Delhi that told the firm to stop operating locally, after an Uber driver allegedly raped a passenger. Meanwhile, the cities of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, and Portland, Oregon, have also told the firm to stay off the roads (via police complaint and lawsuit respectively), and an Uber driver in San Francisco has been charged with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter for driving over and killing a six-year-old girl.
https://gigaom.com/2014/12/09/uber-banned-in-spain-thailand-sued-in-portland-hassled-in-rio/
Also at: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-30395093
Also, I wonder why we
(people like us) also did not notice the potential threat. Many people in our office were using this
service; they were giving away some code to get Rs 300 discount on Uber app; no
one thought that absence of an emergency number or even a call center could be
security threat... Uber's marketing was so strong that people did not doubt
it or expected anything wrong from Uber's part.. Media was busy writing articles about Uber's Mercs and BMWs and at the
most about its payment service which saved customers' credit card numbers (as
if we did not want to burn calories in swiping our cards every time). If this
is to indicate, we must do safety audit in many other sectors and services
too...
Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect views of any organization author is associated with.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Grandpa and the Kid
Saw an old man
carrying his small grandchild in his arms while they returned from a temple.
Perhaps from a Shiva temple as the child had mark of white bhabhut on its
forehead. Ever wondered what a kid would learn by visiting temples? A child
does not know about gods, bhakti, karma, religion, or anything! I think the
idea is to do indirect teaching. We don't learn most of the things we are
taught (otherwise all of us would be Einsteins) and we learn most of the things
not taught to us (like all the bad things mothers complain about). So let the
child learn indirectly by observing what we are doing.
Now this is scary
from the point of view of those parents who think the kid is too small to learn
anything and hence they could do anything in its presence! Like arguing,
watching excessive TV, smoking, or being lazy!
If the kid is
watching you - you have to be worthy of being watched by an innocent cute kid!
© Rahul
Image below just for a change; credits mentioned:
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Anatomy of a dream
This morning I saw a
dream - that I am an Indian soldier on the run while some Pakistani rangers are
chasing me. It is happening in the snow clad mountains... I know that it is
Wednesday. I have been running since Monday and in the dream I know that I have
to run till Friday. So I am running; trying to outsmart the enemies.
Now, this
Monday-Friday schedule indicates that in the dream Pakistani rangers must be
work-related stress/challenges and I must be waiting for the weekend so as to
avoid those. It should be mountains because running is tough there and it must
be snow because in the morning my blanket must be off and I must be feeling cold
in reality while sleeping.
Anatomy of a dream :)
© Rahul
Saturday, December 6, 2014
Annie Menni Talk
“Hello, Rabbit,” he
said, “is that you?”
"Let’s pretend
it isn’t,” said Rabbit, “and see what happens.”
― A.A. Milne, Winnie
The Pooh
"Did you ever walk into a room and forget why you walked in? I think that is how dogs spend their lives."
― Sue Murphy
“What's your name,'
Coraline asked the cat. 'Look, I'm Coraline. Okay?'
'Cats don't have
names,' it said.
'No?' said Coraline.
'No,' said the cat.
'Now you people have names. That's because you don't know who you are. We know
who we are, so we don't need names.”
― Neil Gaiman,
Coraline
“Owners of dogs will
have noticed that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and
affection, they will think you are god. Whereas owners of cats are compelled to
realize that, if you provide them with food and water and shelter and
affection, they draw the conclusion that they are gods.”
― Christopher
Hitchens, The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Nonbeliever
“Women speak because
they wish to speak, whereas a man speaks only when driven to speak by something
outside himself - like, for instance, he can't find any clean socks.”
― Jean Kerr
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)