If you have frequently
flown on Air India, you would have noticed that their staff would rank lowest
in customer service. Their staff are often rude and treat you as if they are
doing you great service by just letting you fly with them. For record, Air
India was ranked as "third worst Airline in the World" just 2 months
back (https://tinyurl.com/zop5uyx). It is in this background that I looked at
the recent media-generated outrage against a politician for beating up an Air
India staff with great curiosity and amusement.
I also noticed one
thing repeated in all media reports - that the politician assaulted a
"60-year-old duty manager". 60 years old and yet not retired? Oh yes
- Air India was seeing an exodus of staff and hence a few years back it raised
retirement age from 58 to 60. That is against the trend in sectors like
airlines where younger and energetic staff is preferred. The media appeared to
be highlighting the age of the duty
manager to garner public sympathy for him and against the MP. And it had
to not mention the age of the MP which is 56 - just 4 years younger.
Next, the punishment
suggested by media was of idiotic proportions. According to media, he should be
sacked from parliament, banned by his party, not to mention named and shamed on
national television for days and night - without caring about what adverse
impact it could create on him and his family members. It reminded me the case
of a tainted govt officer, whose family committed suicide after he was caught
and received huge media attention. Any punishment should correspond to the
gravity of the crime. The case should go to the court which should decide on
the punishment; but media had already conducted "media trial" and
need not bother about sanity.
The particulars of the
case are interesting. The MP felt he was wronged (by not being given business
class seat); hence remained seated in the aircraft after it landed; and
declined to get down - something which is called "Satyagrah". Since
the scuffle happened after planed had landed and no other passenger was on
board, of course there was no threat to the other passengers.
Compare the case to
what happened with popular comedian Kapil Sharma. Kapil was drunk and he abused
and beat up his colleagues including Sunil Grower "in air" - and
thereby was a threat to the flight as well as to other passengers. But no media
houses asked for his ban from flying, or airing off of his TV show, or defamed
him by playing the video 24X7. In fact a lot of TV news channels did not
discuss this episode openly.
So why was the
politician a recipient of such a bad press while the comedian was protected?
Because of many reasons. The MP came from a background which is not trending.
He is a tough looking male - member of a right wing political party without
national presence - a politician who is not in power - all criteria made him
ideal for victimization by the electronic media. On the other hand, Kapil is
chubby and innocent looking - is a comedian with huge nation wide fan following
- a man who is part of TV and Bollywood and hence highly powerful - all these
factors make him ideal to play the victim rather than the assailant.
Thanks to the media,
the rude staff of Air India are enjoying hero like status while an elected
representative is paying huge price. What would be the repercussions of this
event in the long run? If you are a customer of such government organizations -
beware. Their spirits are high - if they can do this to
an MP - who are you and me? Forget it. Just keep silence and tolerate all that
happens with you - and then you are a good person. You may even come on TV someday.
- Rahul
No comments:
Post a Comment