Wednesday, July 23, 2025
Tuesday, July 22, 2025
Monday, July 21, 2025
Books: Fooled by Randomness : The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets; by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
As the title indicates, this book is about the significance of randomness in our life. Published in 2001, this book was a precursor to his more famous work, "The Black Swan," further developing many of the ideas introduced here.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, a former options trader, argues that our brains are not wired to comprehend the true nature of probability and the impact of rare, high-impact events. We tend to attribute success to skill and hard work, while conveniently overlooking the immense influence of luck and unforeseen random occurrences. Conversely, failures are often attributed to external factors rather than a misunderstanding of risk.
The book has a few areas of improvements in my opinion: I feel there is a slight confusion in the book about its target audience, since the book addresses a diverse set of contexts: a mix of philosophy, psychology, stock market trading, and history. The length of the book also ‘feels’; and I think 1/3 to 1/2 of the book can be easily trimmed to make it more effective for readers. Also, during the first half of the book, the writer’s tongue in cheek style of writing creates a distraction for the readers; especially since the subject is a grave one. This improves as we get towards the latter part of the book near its end, which is most enlightening.
Here are some of the important points from the book:
- Our brains aren't wired to grasp true probability or the immense impact of rare, high-consequence events.
- Much perceived "skill" is actually luck disguised as deterministic outcomes.
- It is not wise to rely on inductive reasoning – drawing general conclusions from specific observations – especially in complex and unpredictable systems. Empirical data can be misleading because it only represents what has happened, not what could happen or will happen.
- We only see the single realized path of events, overlooking countless "alternate histories" that could've occurred.
- Hindsight Bias: Believing we "knew it all along."
- Confirmation Bias: Seeking only information that confirms our beliefs.
- Narrative Fallacy: Creating false cause-and-effect stories for random events.
- Overconfidence: Overestimating our abilities and predictions.
- Halo Effect: Our overall impression of a person (e.g., successful) influences our perception of their specific traits, making us attribute their success to admirable qualities, even if those qualities were not truly the cause.
- Survivorship bias: We focus only on successes, ignoring the numerous failures.
- The "Turkey Problem": Past patterns don't guarantee future consistency, especially with extreme events.
- Silent evidence: The unseen data of failures that distort our understanding of success.
- Embrace Stoicism to accept what's beyond our control and maintain rationality amidst uncertainty.
- Rahul
Sunday, July 20, 2025
Saturday, July 19, 2025
Friday, July 18, 2025
Books: The Psychology of Money: Timeless lessons on wealth, greed, and happiness: By Morgan Housel
I had been reading about this book
and its author Morgan Housel for quite some time. Finally, I got chance to
finish this book. I highly recommend it to all.
During my MBA, I had come across a
subject called “behavioral finance” for the first time. It was enlightening to study
and it all made sense. This book is the second such education I underwent.
The most important part I want to
highlight about this book is that the author appears very honest in it. Honesty
is often an underrated trait in the world of writing. Along with age, I have
been observing and appreciating it more and more. Near the end of the book, the
author has also included a chapter where he describes his own personal
investment style. He mentions that he mainly invests in low-cost index funds,
no risky investments, does not take debt, lives frugal lifestyle, saves lot of
his income for the rainy days, and it clearly seems that he practices what he advocates.
It was very touching.
There are about 20 chapters in this
book and all contain timeless wisdom related to life in general and wealth in
particular. Since I read a lot, I had come across a few of those lessons earlier
form other sources, but most of the book came as a great read and a great realization.
It is really nice to come across such
an honest book and this author who seems so genuine. Hats off to Morgan and as
I mentioned in the beginning, I highly recommend this book to one and all.
- Rahul Tiwary
Thursday, July 17, 2025
Wednesday, July 16, 2025
Tuesday, July 15, 2025
Monday, July 14, 2025
Travelogue: Some Pictures from Muzaffarpur, Bihar
(Clockwise from top left)
Icon Plaza Mall, Bhagwanpur
Sikandarpur Lakefront
Royal Mansion Banquet Hall, Goshala Road
Motijheel Flyover
A mango orchard in Muzaffarpur
Sahu Pokhar Ram Janaki Mandir
Busts of freedom fighters Prafulla Chandra Chaki (1888-1908) and Khudi Ram Bose (1889-1908) at Muzaffarpur
Sunday, June 22, 2025
How the Afghanistan Withdrawal May Have Contributed to US Hesitation in Entering Israel Iran War
The argument that a delay in the US
entering a potential Iran war is due to a loss of confidence post-withdrawal
from Afghanistan is a compelling one. There are strong arguments supporting
this link.
The final days of the US withdrawal
from Afghanistan, including the chaotic evacuation from Kabul airport were
widely criticized. This chaotic imagery, including scenes of desperation and
the Abbey Gate attack, led many to question the planning and execution
capabilities of the US. The swift Taliban takeover and the perceived
abandonment of Afghan allies were seen as a blow to American prestige and
credibility on the world stage. Adversaries like Russia, China and Iran viewed
this as a sign of US weakness and an emboldening factor for their own actions.
There was also an impact of US
withdrawal from Afghanistan on allies. Some allies expressed concerns about the
manner of the withdrawal, questioning the reliability of US commitments. This
could complicate future coalition operations and affect the willingness of
partners to cooperate.
All of this can change if US
navigates Iran war successfully.
US entering Israel-Iran conflict, if
it were to occur, would likely differ significantly from the Afghanistan
experience in terms of its potential duration and nature. There are key
differences from Afghanistan that could limit its duration in Iran.
In Afghanistan, the US fought an
insurgency (the Taliban) that was deeply embedded in the population, had strong
ideological roots, and could melt away and reappear. It was a non-state actor
with a diffuse structure. Nation-building was a core, long-term objective. But
Iran is a nation with a conventional military. A conflict with Iran would
involve conventional military engagements, air superiority, naval operations
and targeted strikes. While Iran has proxies, the primary adversary is a state
with defined borders and infrastructure.
In Iran, American focus would more
likely be on specific objectives like dismantling its nuclear program,
deterring regional aggression, or degrading its military capabilities. This
limited objective would inherently reduce the scope for a long-term occupation.
Afghanistan's rugged, landlocked
mountains aided insurgency, prolonging conventional ops. Iran's diverse terrain
- deserts, coasts, and cities - offers varied tactical options allowing for
more decisive conventional engagements, unlike Afghanistan.
Post-9/11 mission in Afghanistan
evolved from dismantling Al-Qaeda/Taliban to
nation-building/counter-insurgency, leading to a two-decade presence. Iran
objectives would be narrower: preventing nukes, deterring attacks, ensuring
navigation, or responding to provocations.
Bottom line:
A direct, decades-long occupation
like Afghanistan is unlikely in an Iran conflict due to fundamental structural
and strategic differences. A successful US campaign in the Israel-Iran war
could significantly rebuild confidence in American global leadership. Such an
outcome could help dispel negative perceptions from the Afghanistan withdrawal
and reassure allies of the USA's reliability. Ultimately, the potential
benefits of a decisive intervention could outweigh the risks.
- Rahul
Thursday, June 19, 2025
Arguments for Immediate US Intervention in the Israel-Iran Conflict
After 6-7 days of Israel-Iran war, recent reports suggest that Iran has achieved significant successes in its conflict with Israel, inflicting considerable damage. There is a perception that the US President is delaying intervention, perhaps to legitimize future actions, while relying on social media statements.
The establishment of Israel as a separate nation was intended to prevent catastrophic events for the Jewish people. However, in the current conflict, Israel appears to be engaging Iran without direct support from other Western nations. Questions are being raised about the apparent passivity of the United States, United Kingdom, and France, who seem to be observing the war from a distance.
A strategic concern highlighted is that Israel is constrained from targeting Iranian civilians, as such actions could inadvertently unify the Iranian populace with their government, contrary to the US objective of achieving regime change through popular support. Conversely, Iran is reportedly striking Israeli civilians, possibly due to the perceived ease and cost-effectiveness of such attacks, alongside existing animosity towards Israelis. This situation evokes sympathy for Israeli civilians caught in the conflict.
Only coordinated intervention with Western backing could bring a swift end to the conflict and save Israeli lives. However, if the American objective is primarily regime change in Iran, a rapid resolution might not align with that goal. The lack of apparent concern for Israeli civilians in this context is deemed unfair.
The US is using Israel as a proxy, similar to its perceived utilization of Ukraine against Russia, to achieve broader geopolitical objectives. This strategy places Israelis at a similar risk to that faced by Ukrainians.
The current US President's actions are not significantly different from previous administrations, and he has been preoccupied with social media posturing while Israel faces intense conflict.
As a bottom-line, for the sake of Israeli people, the United States must join Israel in the war against Iran without further delay.
- Rahul
Wednesday, June 18, 2025
Reflections on “Gulaal” (2009): A Cinematic Masterpiece
I recently watched Gulaal
(2009) on the ‘MH One’ TV channel, and I was genuinely stunned by its intricate
plot and the thoughtful execution. The film stands out as a rare gem, far
removed from the typical lot produced in India. Upon discovering that it was
written and directed by Anurag Kashyap, everything made sense—he is a
master of his craft, deserving of the highest honours and recognition.
The film lingered in my mind long
after it ended. One striking observation was that nearly every character who
died seemed to be actively courting their own demise. It’s an eerie pattern
worth noting.
The first to fall was Rananjay
Singh ‘Ransa’, portrayed brilliantly by Abhimanyu Singh. His
performance was so compelling that I looked him up and learned he hails from
Sonpur, Bihar. His natural and powerful acting left a lasting impression.
Ransa, captured by his envious stepbrother, showed no fear. Instead of pleading
for his life, he hurled insults at his armed captor, provoking him until he was
shot. It felt as though Ransa invited his own death.
Later, Dukey Banna (played
with intensity by Kay Kay Menon) orchestrates the killing of Jadwal,
though the film offers no background, making it unclear whether Jadwal’s death
was similarly self-inflicted.
Dukey’s elder brother, Prithvi
Banna, mentally unstable after their father’s death, spirals out of
control. Dukey attempts to shoot him but accidentally kills a dancer instead.
Prithvi’s erratic behaviour made his fate seem inevitable.
Toward the end, Dilip, a young
student, shoots Dukey Banna. Rather than trying to escape or seek help,
Dukey spends his final moments revealing how Dilip’s girlfriend manipulated him
to gain political power. It’s as if Dukey chose to spend his last breath
enlightening a confused youth rather than saving himself.
Bhati, Dukey’s associate, is later killed
by a rival gang. His decision to venture alone into a dark, isolated area is
baffling. He could have eliminated Dilip earlier when he was vulnerable. Even
Bhati's reaction to being shot—standing still, making no attempt to flee—felt
like a silent acceptance of death.
After realizing he was used by Kiran,
Dilip tries but fails to shoot her. It’s a tragic moment, reflecting how
love can paralyze even in the face of betrayal. Her brother then shoots Dilip,
and instead of seeking help, he runs to his empty rented room. That final run
felt deeply symbolic—more a journey of heartbreak than a response to injury. It
was his homecoming, his pilgrimage, his moment of maturity—tragically timed
just before death.
The film’s ending, where the corrupt
triumph and the idealists perish, is both ironic and fitting. Gulaal portrays a
world where predators roam freely, and some characters, knowingly or not,
embrace their fate.
Perhaps when life is lived on one’s
own terms, death becomes less a fearsome end and more a threshold to cross.
- Rahul Tiwary








