Finished an unusual
book - The Prince by
the 15th century political philosopher, historian, writer and diplomat Niccolò Machiavelli. In those times
Italy was being ravaged, humiliated and controlled by foreigners and hence he
wrote this book as a political guide to the Italian Prince. The pages are full
of ideas that are unethical, cunning and wicked in the normal discourse, but
these were indeed the norms those days when kings played games of wars. The
book was published in 1532, about 5 years after his death (I think it is unfair
to publish one’s writing after death, unless so willed), and brought much
controversy and negative image to Machiavelli. Interestingly, the Italian
prince did not agree with the suggestions of this book; I think either because
true leaders don’t need manuals of leadership or else since even wicked people
don’t want to publicly endorse wicked methods. The historical account also
throws light on the military history of Christian Church and Pope.
Reading the book I
also realized that much of history shown in Hollywood epic/historical films is
real... In the book I could also find so many points which are positive and
constructive wisdom, even applicable today.
If you are interested
in history and politics, I am sure you will find it very interesting. The book
is also available on Flipkart.
Reading Machiavelli I also
thought of Arthshastra by Chanakya. I think the main difference is that focus
of Chanakya's verses is on maintaining a state's law and order; rules and
legislation, economy and the system, while The Prince is focused on acquiring
new lands and keeping the reigns no matter by what means. There is little of
what can be called "rules" or "system" in Machiavelli's
texts but it is more about "strategy" here. There is little, except a
prescription on taxation in newly acquired regions, of economics in The Prince.
Also this book is based on 'case studies' method rather than being structured
in the manner of verses or nuggets of prescriptions, like Arthshastra is. So I
think The Price is basically a historical book on military Strategies; while
Arthshastra is a book of management and economic policies. Only sections on
national security or military from Chanakya’s work would match with subject of
Machiavelli’s book; so Arthshastra is much broader. Just last month I finished
reading ‘Corporate Chanakya’ by Radhakrishnan Pillai where entire Arthshasta
has been presented as a text book of modern day management…