Friday, October 2, 2026
Thursday, October 1, 2026
Tuesday, September 15, 2026
Fiction: 'The Story' - By Rahul Tiwary
There was a woman who was a writer; she once wrote a story about some things at some place. There were half a dozen characters in her story. It was a gripping story with an intriguing beginning and a comforting end immediately after several twists in the plot. She was happy with her creation and post the book launch, it became successful with everyone appreciating it. People liked the story, they liked the world she had created, they liked the characters in it, in general. What no one knew and even the writer did not realise was that one of the characters did not want the story to end.
He was a man; not the protagonist, but one of the leads. As per the writer's style, her stories were never about or around a single character. One fine morning, after she had tea and was yet to think about having anything to eat, 'it' occurred to her. She tried to think which of the characters was 'he', but she could not figure it out.
She opened her book again, glanced through the opening story, but could not figure it out. One man, a character from the title story of her hugely successful book, was not gone after the story had ended. We can't say that the man 'came alive', because he was never dead; for rebirth to be possible. Can we say he just came out of the pages of her books? Just walked outside?
The writer was confused. She desperately wanted to figure it out who the character was; what was his name and what was he like, so that she could end it all peacefully. She wanted the man out of her mind, similar to how people scare away any houseflies if those happen to come near them. She wanted to kill, finish off, the character, so that she could get rid of him.
It was important for her to get rid of him. Only then she could move on, truly. She wanted to start her new book and she had picked up an entirely new genre and theme. The man from her last book was of no use to her.
The man just won't go. He just remained there, saying nothing, doing nothing, no harm or no scene too. He just wanted to 'exist'.
Existence is a strange thing. It can do things to you, or it can take things from you. It is difficult to define existence. No one knows when you 'exist' and when you don't, even if you look exactly the same on both occasions. It is your little secret, your little witchcraft.
After being disturbed for quite some time due to the man, the woman invented a plan. The plan will eliminate the man forever.
The writer wrote another book, with the same title as the previous one. The publisher of course did not like the idea and when he failed to convince her to use a different title, thankfully the year end was approaching and hence he decided to put (2027) i.e. year of publication at the end of the book title to qualify it as a different title.
The writer finished her new book in record time. She had rewritten the whole title story. Word by word and sentence by sentence, the story was so different from the one in the last book, that no one else could understand the plan she was executing while writing it. Since characters in a book are countable, the man from her last book could not escape her design. To be on the safe side, she had killed every character from her last story in this new story. 'The man' must be dead!
After the new book came out, it was a similar scene after her first book. The new book had become a huge success too, and people were in awe with how she had written such a fresh story with an entirely new idea. She was labeled as a young 'genius' and an established name in the world of modern literature in India. But, she was waiting for something else. Or, someone else.
Did the man still come? Or did he really get killed as the new story said?
She waited for a day. Then she waited for a week. Then a month. By this time, it almost felt as if she 'wanted' the man, the mystery character from her last book, to come alive. But did it happen?
Did the man want it too?
Till date, the faithful readers of the writer are still intrigued by the time when she wrote those two books. Those two books were called her best books ever. She went on to become an award winning famous author and journalist, earning name and fame for herself and gaining wealth in the process too. But, she could never recreate the hidden genius of those two books.
'The man' from her book never came back. No other man or any other character ever came alive like he had done. Deep inside, she knew of her guilt. She felt like she had 'sinned' by killing the character. It had all happened in her mind. Could she "do it again"; or do something to bring him back?
She decided to let it be. Let the little secret be a little secret. Her secret.
No one understands genius. Even a genius does not truly understand genius. That is the magical thing about it.
- Rahul Tiwary
Monday, September 14, 2026
Sunday, September 13, 2026
Preciousness of Life and Other Tragedies
In Hindu philosophy, there is much importance given to the realization that our life is very precious. At a level, it is also done to keep people on the path of righteousness and to achieve a peaceful, prosperous and productive society. Sage after sage, and saint after saint has said the same thing - that our life is precious. But after centuries of progress and spiritual awakening, if we look around us, do we see people by large behaving in a manner consistent with this realization?
There is so much selfishness all around, and wretched people making other people suffer, evil people using every opportunity to harass others, and so on. Number of 'good people' in our society in general is alarmingly low. People in general behave good with you if they need something from you, otherwise you are nothing for them. People in general are wasting their own life in mundane race to collect more and more money, and wasting everyone else's life in the process too. Do they take some of the money to their 'afterlife' once they are dead?
And those people who can't afford to waste their or other people's life, are busy wasting time watching short videos on their mobile phones!
It won't be an exaggeration to say that in our society, there is absolutely zero realization of the fact that our life is precious. Or is it that there is a secret and quiet realization in our society that our life is "not precious"?
If we push this theory, it fits very well. Since life is not precious, people need to tolerate it, spend it, waste it, or do whatever with it, since nothing matters. Let wretched people harass innocent people, let evil people harass noble souls for their pleasure, because, since life is not precious, why be any good?
It is a great tragedy for our country that along with material progress, we are fast losing all the spiritual greatness achieved by our ancestors. It pains to understand what a shameful achievement we have made with this trend.
Hoping for some miracle to save the soul of our people and our country.
- Rahul
Saturday, September 12, 2026
Friday, September 11, 2026
Nice shopkeepers
I went to buy some cloth in a shop for the first time. In fact, I had searched on the internet to find where "Only Vimal" brand of fabric was being sold, since few months ago it had occurred to me that I had not seen it anywhere for long time. Like most people of our time, I had grown into habit of buying 'readymade' shirts until few years ago I saw how my father still got his shirts stitched by a tailor in our hometown, and hence I had started the same practice too. Vimal brand is owned by Reliance and since I am a huge enthusiast for Indian brands and Indian businesses, for few months I have been looking for opportunity to buy a Vimal brand fabric.
Most of such businesses in our hometown are owned by Marwaris and it is possible that the new shop I went to was also owned by one. The experience I got there touched me a lot.
I was greeted by an elderly person, who seemed the owner of the shop. The shop was very well maintained. There was another boy along with the man who seemed like his son. Both the man and the boy were very polite and talked to me in such a nice way. There was not even an iota of negativity in them or their behaviour.
Usually I make very quick decisions while shopping and hence I was done in 5-10 minutes, but the elderly shop owner showed me some extra material too. I liked whatever he showed, although I bought only what I had gone there for.
After coming out of the shop, the extremely nice behaviour of both of the shopkeepers touched me a lot. I don't know when was the last time anyone talked to me so nicely like they had done. It would be a tragedy if politeness and nice behaviour are restricted to salesmen or businessmen in our society.
Still feeling touched by the behaviour of two gentlemen.
- Rahul
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Why I shall never buy an iPhone
Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Existential crisis: From futility of life to futility of death
Tuesday, September 8, 2026
Monday, September 7, 2026
The world post Covid crisis: the joke was on us
During Covid crisis (due to 'Chinese virus'), our dear PM Modi used to make many speeches on TV. I remember one of his statements which stuck with me afterwards, where he said that world history would be divided into two parts: pre-Covid and post-Covid. He said the way our world worked would change so much drastically after Covid crisis, and many of those changes would be permanent. After 6 years since the crisis, this statement looks so much misplaced. Nothing changed in post-Covid world.
Nothing changed in post-Covid world and we were able to know this even after 1.5 years since the crisis. People continued to be good, bad or evil. Companies continued to be exploitative, generous or indifferent. Society continued to be as it were before Covid crisis. Even the types of crimes or incidents reported in newspapers have been exactly the same. What really changed?
I can't even start to suggest that even a few things changed. The much hyped digital transformation was going on even before Covid crisis. Ignoring the two year period immediately after the crisis, its pace adjusted and now after 6 years from the crisis, the law of averages took over completely and we can't even say anything forced caused digital rapid adoption over a long time horizon.
PM Modi was not the only one proven wrong about our world. Most of the optimists have been on the same boat.
I have read spiritual masters, philosophers, or many great successful men; they all have been proven wrong by our world.
Hoping that optimism does not vanish from the lexicon very soon and God leaves some hope on the table for the 'optimists' to survive.
- Rahul
Sunday, September 6, 2026
The rotten fish theory
Saturday, September 5, 2026
Why people don't talk to strangers
After staying in waiting area of a hospital for several days, I realised why generally people in India avoid talking to strangers. Here is how the things unfolded.
When I started staying there, I did not talk to anyone initially. After around a week, when I went back there after a gap, I noticed that a very obese boy of around 20 had occupied the sofa adjacent to mine. He started by asking a simple question, then about my patient, then started giving me unnecessary but seemingly helpful tips like going out of hospital for lunch in nearby restaurants, or bottled water being sold in hospital at exorbitant rates. And once I was comfortable talking to him, he asked me for my "mobile charger"! I said I had to go away for some work and I would give him my charger afterwards. And I went back to the place only in the evening. As soon as he saw me, he asked for the mobile charger! Annoyed, I told him that I thought he would have asked anyone else for the charger since whole day had passed since he asked me first time in the morning! And what does he reply? He said, "I feel shy asking things from strangers, hence I did no ask anyone else and waited for you". So, I was not a "stranger" for him? I finally gave him my charger only late night and asked it back after 1.5 hours and to my relief, he respectfully complied. Over next several days, I had to give him my mobile charger at least once daily. All because I spoke to him on day-1.
After many days, I was at a different seat and this time two men came. They asked me about what happened to my patient, and I did the mistake of replying to them. Hearing my answer, one of them spoke towards the other, looking at with 'disgust', saying "I told you! Most people come to this hospital with insurance only". He was totally wrong in his assumption, but of course I did not correct him. So, while I had done the mistake of talking to these two men, they tried to extract its price the very next morning.
Next morning, when I woke up and went to washroom, I noticed that my slippers were looking as if they had moved slightly from their place. I immediately suspected those two men of trying out my slippers. And within 10 minutes, I got the proof. One of them got a phone call and ran towards the exit door, and being suspicious I immediately checked my slippers and they had vanished! Losing no time, I immediately shouted at the man near exit door of the hall asking if he had my slippers and he said yes and he would return those in two minutes. Loudly enough, I said "no, bring my slippers back right now!" And he came back running. I told him that this was not a baraat-ghar where people had come for amusement, and what would I do without slippers or shoe if I was called by the doctors urgently? The two men obviously did not care.
Afterwards, I felt satisfied and a bit happy at the manner in which I had shouted at (which was out of character for me) the man who had taken my slippers, and had disrupted "the borrowing games". Like when in Rome behave like Romans, when in Patna, at least behave like Patna-people when needed.
I did not talk to anyone after encounter with above two men and hence I did not face any further borrowing/stealing dilemma.
Due to above incidents, I realised why many people just don't say even a word to strangers; because they fear the strangers would try to extract benefits out of them later.
No country for private men.
- Rahul Tiwary
Friday, September 4, 2026
The Falsehood of Social Service
Long back, when I was working at Infosys, a colleague joined office and he was allocated seat near my cubicle. Those days, employees used to have fixed place to sit and work from, I am sure it is like this for most companies even now, although many IT companies have switched to 'cost saving' by removing physical allocation of cubicle to employees. Due to fixed cubicle, we used to have "neighbours" and got to bond with them. I remember, the new colleague was very obese and had just come to India after working in the USA for many years. When asked, he said he shifted to India to better look after family, although he did not like life and facilities in India as much. He was also upset that some of the promises made to him at the time of joining had not materialised, and he was not even happy with his work because he was given project work in a different area than his core skill. Remembering those days, it feels like very good times, when there were plenty of jobs, plenty of employees and plenty of choices and grievances.
At that time when the new and 'unhappy' employee started working from the cubicle next to me, there was a donation drive conducted in office to fund some social work. I remember a couple of colleagues visited cubicle-to-cubicle and collected funds. They did not ask for more than Rs 100 and I was happy to contribute the same amount when asked. But the US returned rich but unhappy colleague declined to contribute anything! When asked about the reason, he said something like, "We already pay so much money in taxes to the government, what is the need to also spend money in charity? Why government is not making use of tax money to fund all those social work?" After the contribution seeking volunteers went back disappointed, the particular colleague kept repeating his moral stand of not contributing.
At that time, I did not understand his motive much. All these years, this incident came to my mind many times and I still did not fully understand his stand. But recently, a thought came to my mind, which made me look at that incident in a whole new light.
First of all, I don't think the colleague was right in assuming that our social obligations end with paying taxes to government. Paying taxes is not a voluntary act from our side, but it is a statutory requirement which we fulfill without giving a thought, and often to save ourselves from prosecution or penalisation too. I think true charity or social work has to be a voluntary act, where we "choose to help" when we had a "choice not to help". Therefore, his theory and moral stand for not contributing was juvenile at best.
At the same time, a thought came to me recently about how much role "external validation" plays in the things we do; and why do we think that only helping "strangers" count towards social service. How about a man giving money to an orphanage supporting children, but at the same time not giving time to his own children who keep getting raised without proper love and care of their parents? How about someone making visits to old-age-home and giving financial support to the old people living there, but at the same time one's own old parents are living troubled devoid of love and care by their grownup children? Why is it that giving love and care to one's own family or blood relatives not considered akin to social work? Like it has happened to child-raising where a woman goes to school to take care of other people's children while her own children are also being taken care by others, making a chain of weird "unsocial" relationships; if we stretch this to other spheres of life, the world becomes too gloomy.
Under light of these thought, I am looking at the behaviour of my old colleague, my own behaviour and work, as well as all the ongoing things around me in a different shade.
What if there is no social brownie points to be earned for doing social work or charity; how many would still choose to do it? And how many of us would understand that prioritizing the welfare of their own family does not make them selfish or bad people? Our own family, children, parents, relatives, they all are part of the "society" we intend to service, and although we shall not get any "certificate of appreciation" for doing something for them, what we do shall still be very valuable. And perhaps irreplaceable.
Hoping for peace and health of one and all.
- Rahul Tiwary
Thursday, September 3, 2026
Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Review: Jio Notebook - 8 Reasons to Buy This Fantastic Small Laptop
Tuesday, September 1, 2026
Death of a woman in Madhya Pradesh hospital and excesses done by hospitals
There was a recent news airing on TV which caught my attention. A woman admitted to hospital for child delivery died after accusing the hospital staff of threatening of killing her. Even her baby died. The TV channel showed a video where the woman was shouting for help and within few hours both she and the child were dead. It was shocking and a question would come to the mind of all viewers whether her accusations were true.
Until a few months ago, I would have found it difficult to believe, but not any more. I witnessed a horrible incident in one of the best known hospitals where, when an old person removed cannula attached to his hand due to pain and irritation, the hospital staff threatened him with "tying his hands and legs" if he did it again. When patient was admitted to Emergency ward, attendant is not allowed to stay with the patient for a long duration and hence hospital staff sent the attendant away. After an hour when the attendant comes back, he sees the patient lying with splash of blood lying all around, all clothes, bedsheets, etc had blood, perhaps half a cup blood was wasted and blood was constantly coming out of cannula on his hand. Even the medicine which was supposed to be given to the patient with water, was lying on he floor. When he looked around to see what nurses and doctors were doing, he saw that all were busy on their "smart phones", paying no attention to his patient. When he asked a junior doctor to help, he sent a male nurse who instead of feeling sorry, got angry at the patient and have him warning against doing again and forced the attendant to sign a "consent" to tie up the patient if he does it again! So much in the name of wellness and healthcare.
In newspapers, I have seen news where doctors of government hospital ask for monetary bribe from patient for doing surgery. And of course government hospital staff ask for bribe at every steps and also mistreat patients if they do not comply.
On the other hand, we also see news of doctors being beaten up by families of patients, and while whole society's sympathy is with doctors on this matter, I am beginning to get a sense of why many times such violence take place in the first place. We never see nurses and other staff being beaten up, because perhaps they put whole blame on doctors.
It is sad to realise that despite so much progress in all fields, healthcare in India is still substandard and coping up under huge crowd of patients as well as marred by mismanagement by the hospital staff. While PM Modi's vision to make India a developed country by 2047 is being realised at a fast pace, his own policy of providing free mediclaim to the poor and old people (Ayushman Yojna) has caused severe crowding of even the best of hospitals, bringing down their quality of healthcare.
There are no easy solutions to this problem, but government should take note of all such incidents being reported by patients and bring such hospitals to the task, so that these do not repeat. Patients and their family are already suffering due to illness, and if hospital staff carry out atrocities over them, it is double tragedy.
Hope government works hard to bring quality healthcare to the people of our country.
- Rahul
Saturday, August 1, 2026
Friday, July 3, 2026
Thursday, July 2, 2026
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
Monday, June 15, 2026
Travelogue: Baby Krishna With a Bicycle
Sunday, June 14, 2026
Saturday, June 13, 2026
Friday, June 12, 2026
Thursday, June 11, 2026
Wednesday, June 10, 2026
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
Monday, June 8, 2026
Sunday, June 7, 2026
Saturday, June 6, 2026
Friday, June 5, 2026
Thursday, June 4, 2026
Wednesday, June 3, 2026
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Monday, June 1, 2026
List of Some Places of Visit Around Pune
- Shaniwar Wada
- Vishram Bagh Wada Palace
- Dagdusheth Ganpati Mandir
- Tilak Smarak Mandir
- Ayyappa Temple
- Inorbit Mall
- Chakan Fort
- Induri Fort
- Raj Kapoor Memorial
- Pune Tribal Museum
- Shri Subramania Swamy Temple
- Film and Television Institute of India
- Premal Hanuman Temple
- Bhama Askhed Dam
- Jambhulwadi Lake
- Bund Garden
- Tail-Baila Fort
- Kranti Flamingo Point
- Gandhi National Memorial
- Zapurza Museum of Art and Culture
- Kamla Nehru Park
- Lal Mahal
- Katraj Lake
- Junnar Caves
- Chittaranjan Vatika Garden
- Mayureshwar Wildlife Sanctuary
- Pratishirdi Shri Saibaba Mandir
- Appu Ghar Amusement Park
- Seven Wonders Dream Park
- Joshi’s Museum of Miniature Railways
- Shri Mahalakshmi Mandir, Sarasbaug, Pune
- Amazeum Children’s Museum
- Ishanya Mall
- Lavasa International Convention Centre
- Peshwa Udyan Zoo
- Jangali Maharaj Temple
- Shri Wagheshwar Temple
- Malhargarh Fort
- Bagul Udyan
- Bhatghar Dam
- Saint Tukaram Gatha Mandir
- University of Pune
- Morgaon Mayureshwar Temple
- Empress Gardens
- Trishundha Ganpati Temple
- Dive Ghat Valley
- Tung Fort
- Kanifnath Temple
- Baner Hill
- Sant Dnyaneshwar Maharaj Samadhi
- Sambhaji Maharaj Samadhi
- Shri Someshwar Temple
- Osho International Meditation Resort
- Purandar Fort
- Saras Baug
- Gram Sanskruti Udyan Village Park
- Ghorwadeshwar Caves
- Pashan Lake
- Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary
- Neelkantheshwar
- Seasons Mall
- Koregaon Park
- Lonavala Lake
- Ranjangaon Ganpati Temple
- Amanora Mall
- Taljai Hill
- Shri Satya Sai Pandurang Kshetra
- Narayani Dham Temple
- BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir
- Tulsibag Market
- Raja Dinkar Kelkar Museum
- Sarasbaug Ganpati Temple
- Chaturshrungi Temple
- Bhuleshwar Temple
- Pataleshwar Cave
- Osho Teerth Park
- Kasarsai Dam
- National Defence Academy
- Khadakwasala Dam
- Parvati Temple
- Mulsi Dam
- Aga Khan Palace
- Tamhini Ghat
- Rajiv Gandhi Zoological Park
- Sri Balaji Mandir
- ISKCON NVCC Temple
- Sinhagad Fort
- Mahabaleshwar – Panchgani
- Peshwa Energy Park
- Vetal Tekdi
- Osho Garden
- National War Memorial
Sunday, May 31, 2026
Movie Review: Chand Mera Dil (2026); and Why People Criticized Ananya Panday’s Bharatnatyam
I got interested in watching ‘Chand
Mera Dil’ after seeing news of social media users making fun of actress Ananya Panday
for her Bharatnatyam dance in this film. I thought to check why people were so
agitated. After watching this film, I realized it was a case of “much ado about
nothing”. Ananya Panday had danced during “fresher’s function” of her engineering
college. And her Bharatnatyam was not a pure one but a ‘fusion’ to make it
funny for viewers. Entire college enjoyed that dance and were astonished. So,
the film never claimed that Ananya was making a classical dance performance in
this film. Instead of appreciating Ananya and this film for depicting one of the
Indian native dance forms, people on social media were making fun of it and it
was disappointing. I would give her 10/10 for that dance. And the ‘hero’ of the
film Lakshya fell in love with her seeing that dance.
In “Chand Mera Dil”, Ananya’s
character is named “Chandni” which is a refreshing name in the current times.
Lakshya is playing the role of Aarav, a promising engineering student who
sacrifices his career to support Chandni. I don’t want to give too much
spoilers, but I can tell you that I felt like quitting the film mid-way by the
intermission because the film was so intense and troubling at the same time.
The theatre where I was watching the
film was filled with young men and women. And a group of them were sitting in my
row. Initial minutes of the film were all about love, hence everything went
fine. The moment it turned into “marriage”, one girl started getting ‘triggered’.
She started talking to her friends around her, started judging whatever
happened on the screen, and passed comments. There was a scene after which she
started shouting “loser” at Aarav, the male lead. Immediately, the picture of a
typical male-hating fake-feminist came to my mind. She kept shouting at Aarav,
calling him whatever bad things she could, and it went on for some time and it
was so irritating to hear all that. But by the end of the film, Aarav shows
real character and she went totally silent. The ending of the movie was a bit
comforting and gave people hope, and hence perhaps all previous feelings were forgiven.
The movie depicts struggles and
survival for young couple, but presents the whole story in a unique way, not
seen before. I had become a fan of Lakshya after seeing his film “Kill” (2023) on
TV, and Chand Mera Dil was his first film I watched in a theatre. Same for
Ananya Panday too. After watching this film, I could realize why her critics
were shouting on social media. In this film, her acting skills has shone like a
moon (Chand), and she has really given a powerful and ‘complete’ performance.
She is not a typical “show girl” in this film, but she has played the role of a
versatile character artist. And she has given as great performance as any
A-class actress would have given.
This is overall a very nice film.
Although I won’t recommend this film for either people below 18 or the senior
citizens too. Its target audience is exactly the age Aarav and Chadni are
playing – in their mid or late 20s. Hence, overall recommended to above
audience.
- Rahul
Friday, May 22, 2026
Thursday, May 21, 2026
Social Media Cockroaches: For How Long Shall We Allow Anarchy to Rule Social Media “Jungle Raaj” While Tech Firms Earn Billions?
I read in news
that the Supreme Court chief justice recently compared unemployed youth with
“parasites”, and then a social media storm broke down. Finally, the chief
justice had to “disown” his earlier statement saying he was “misquoted”
(sounded like what politicians do daily). When I looked up the news, I found
that in his original statement, the chief justice had meant well and there was
no need to clarify or retract from his position. Here is how.
What the chief justice wanted to say
was that there are many people around us who live off other people, and instead
of contributing to society, they attack the system society is working on. The
context was a junior lawyer who was using the designation “Senior Advocate”
along with his name on social media for getting attention. The chief justice
got upset at him and perhaps blamed him for being irresponsible and wasteful
like a “cockroach”. The “cockroach” was of course a metaphor for being useless
and wasteful.
The eventual social media furore over
his comment totally justified his initial statement. The unemployed youth
wasting their time on social media went on to create numerous satirical
entities after replacing a term with “cockroach” and wasted days in the name of
humour and satire. How long can one sit over one’s high horse – finally the
horse has to take rest and fodder too, right? Eventually, the social media
uproar will end and the only effect this whole episode will have is lowering
the dignity of our justice system and making a joke of our constitution given
right of free speech.
As we have seen during many
controversies, social media platforms have shown zero control over stopping
misleading, incorrect, fake, malicious or defamatory content. At the same time,
they are earning billions of dollars every year due to the content created by
users. For how long shall we allow total “anarchy” rule and social media
content visibility policies changing the way people speak or behave on these
platforms? If we expect real world to be rule-based, and society functioning on
principles and ethical boundaries, why should we allow social media to be a
lawless, “Jungle Raaj”?
It is high time the Supreme Court of
India must look into this matter since we have seen many a time on such issues
that only the SC can help and no other institution comes up to correct the
situation. Lawless, anarchist, misleading and defamatory nature of social media
must be purged, to make it rule-based, fair, and a controlled entity. It is
very much possible to achieve, just look at how the early-days social media
platforms were designed, for clues. Along with time, “virality” was given first
priority while designing these platforms and this is the root cause of all
evils. This problem can be solved in one day, if the Supreme Court orders.
There are many other important concerns like restricting social media for
children, making content copyright compliant, stopping use of these platforms
for crime and financial fraud.
The day the Supreme Court takes up
this matter in its hands, it won’t matter how many cockroaches line up to
shout, the insecticide of law will be powerful enough to control them for the
benefit of everyone.
- Rahul










































