On
the way back from office, at a particular point on the roadside, I sensed there
was a scuffle going on. Or it was a fight about to break out between some
people. When I crossed the scene, I noticed that two auto-rickshaws had stopped
and a tall dark guy in his late 20s was having a scuffle with someone, while
two women were also standing by and then one of the women tried to stop and
calm down the boy. From the way they were dressed, they all looked uneducated. The
boy got agitated by her interruption and angrily shouted at her. It seemed she
was his mother and she was stopping him from getting into physical fight with
an auto-rickshaw driver.
I
have read this ‘feminist’ claim many times that if women ruled the world, there
won’t be any wars. While history tells a very different story, I think this
claim is just another feminist propaganda made with a singular motive in mind.
What I think a valid statement could be is to say that there won’t be any wars if
“mothers” ruled the world. Not all women have got the mindset or character to
think like a mother. Mothers, because of their God-like act of giving birth to
a child, have a natural tendency to “preserve” and are naturally “anti-destruction”.
One who constructs can’t be naturally inclined towards destruction. This is why;
the role of “creator” is marked with a different god than the “destroyer” in
Hindu Trinity (three aspects of God/Paramatman). If mothers had the power to influence
events, at local or global level, it is logical to believe there won’t be any fighting,
war or destructions.
Bogged
down by deliberate and mindless wars, our world desperately needs everyone to
think from the eyes of a mother.
- Rahul Tiwary